ID | Peptide Seq | Site Residue | Position in Peptide | Position in Protein |
---|---|---|---|---|
10014549 | QSSGHGRQGSGSGQSPSR | S | 17 | 1714 |
10014550 | GSGSGQSPSYGRHGSGSGR | S | 4 | 900 |
10014551 | HSSGRGQHSSGSGQSPGHGQRGSGSGQSPSSGQHGTGFGR | S | 15 | 423 |
10014552 | QSLGHGRQGSGSRQSPSHVRHGSGSGHSSSHGQHGSGSSYSYSR | S | 2 | 293 |
ID | Method | Analytical Throughput | Ambiguity | Species | Sample Type | Condition | log2Ratio | P Value | Data Source PMID | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10014549 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | None | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious | ||
10014550 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | None | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious | ||
10014551 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | None | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious | ||
10014552 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | None | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious |
ID | Peptide Seq | Site Residue | Position in Peptide | Position in Protein | Method | Analytical Throughput | Ambiguity | Species | Sample Type | Data Source PMID | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10014549 | QSSGHGRQGSGSGQSPSR | S | 17 | 1714 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious |
10014550 | GSGSGQSPSYGRHGSGSGR | S | 4 | 900 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious |
10014551 | HSSGRGQHSSGSGQSPGHGQRGSGSGQSPSSGQHGTGFGR | S | 15 | 423 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious |
10014552 | QSLGHGRQGSGSRQSPSHVRHGSGSGHSSSHGQHGSGSSYSYSR | S | 2 | 293 | MS | HTP | unambiguous | wheat | plumules | 31061102 | The entry name which is directly from the original paper is a bit dubious |